Meta-Analysis Resources

Tools for Those Who Summarize the Evidence Base

Resources and networking for those who conduct or interpret meta-analyses related to any phenomenon that is gauged in multiple studies.


Methodological Quality

Members: 5
Latest Activity: Jul 20, 2017

Discussion Forum

This group does not have any discussions yet.

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Methodological Quality to add comments!

Comment by Yeshvanth JP on April 9, 2014 at 3:55pm

I am working on a meta-analysis of risk association. We are including only case-control studies and we are using the NOS (Newcastle-Ottawa scale) to rate the quality of studies. However, we are having some difficulty interpreting the exposure questions. For 'ascertainment of exposure', how is secure record different from medical record only? Aren't all medical records secure? 

Also, how does one award a star for the 3rd exposure question (non-response rate) when you are measuring  a particular hormone in blood, e.g.: insulin? How does non-response even come into play here? 

Thanks in advance. 


Members (5)


© 2018   Created by Blair T. Johnson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service