Meta-Analysis Resources

Tools for Those Who Summarize the Evidence Base

Resources and networking for those who conduct or interpret meta-analyses related to any phenomenon that is gauged in multiple studies.

I would like to open a discussion on the calculation and reporting of interrater reliabilty.   First, what degree of importance is currently placed on this facet of meta-analysis in the peer-reviewed literature?  Is there a gold standard for calculating, or do all commonly employed methods enjoy equal regard?  How are these typically reported in the literature:  to present a reliability score on every coded characteristic seems far too cumbersome, yet to generalize across codes risks obscuring important differences.  What's the current standard?  Is it where it should be?

Views: 139

© 2017   Created by Blair T. Johnson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service