"I have a somewhat related question on testing moderators. I'm using the Lipsey & Wilson (2001) macros. Thanks, Blair!
I'm wondering if there is any way to test for strength of moderators (i.e., if both are significant is one better…"
Meta-Analysis Resources
Tools for Those Who Summarize the Evidence Base
David Bennett's Discussions
How to best test for moderators?
3 Replies
In using Mix Pro 2.0, I'm not finding a way to test for moderators of the effect sizes. Is there a way of doing so in SPSS (and/or a good source that explains how to best do this "by hand", as in…Continue
Started this discussion. Last reply by Lauren D'Innocenzo Oct 2, 2012.
Gifts Received
David Bennett has not received any gifts yet
David Bennett's Page
Latest Activity
David Bennett replied to David Bennett's discussion How to best test for moderators?"Thanks for the helpful info.!"
Blair T. Johnson replied to David Bennett's discussion How to best test for moderators?"There are indeed many ways. I am no expert on Mix, but certainly using the Lipsey & Wilson (2001) macros for SPSS has become quite conventional. And their descriptions are quite clear. I would maintain that there advantages in going to Harbord…"
David Bennett posted a discussionHow to best test for moderators?
In using Mix Pro 2.0, I'm not finding a way to test for moderators of the effect sizes. Is there a way of doing so in SPSS (and/or a good source that explains how to best do this "by hand", as in reading the literature it appears that there are a number of different methods being used)?See More
Blair T. Johnson commented on David Bennett's blog post Computing Standard Errors"The link should work now. Sorry for the trouble!"
David Bennett commented on David Bennett's blog post Computing Standard Errors"Thank you for your helpful response. Unfortunately, the link at the bottom appears to lead to a missing page; is there another way of accessing the page?"
Blair T. Johnson commented on David Bennett's blog post Computing Standard Errors"We can start with a basic definition of the standardized mean difference effect size, ES-sub-sm:
where X-sub-G implies the mean for each compared group (and each group is independent), and s-sub-p is the pooled standard deviation. ES-sub-m would be…"
David Bennett posted a blog postComputing Standard Errors
I'm using Mix 2.0 to do a meta-analysis and have Cohen's d computed for each study, but the program appears to require that I also compute standard error's for each effect size. Short of computing it by hand, is there a web site calculator, etc., that I could use instead (i.e., simply entering the sample sizes and Cohen's d)?Thanks. See More
Profile Information
David Bennett's Blog
Computing Standard Errors
I'm using Mix 2.0 to do a meta-analysis and have Cohen's d computed for each study, but the program appears to require that I also compute standard error's for each effect size. Short of computing it by hand, is there a web site calculator, etc., that I could use instead (i.e., simply entering the sample sizes and Cohen's d)?
Thanks.
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 1:10pm — 4 Comments
Comment Wall (1 comment)
- At 10:10am on August 5, 2015, FRANK KWABENA said…
Good Day,
How is everything with you, I picked interest on you after going through your short profile and deemed it necessary to write you immediately. I have something very vital to disclose to you, but I found it difficult to express myself here, since it's a public site.Could you please get back to me on:(frankkwabena99@gmail.com ) for the full details.
Have a nice day
Thanks God bless.
Frank.
© 2017 Created by Blair T. Johnson.
Powered by
