"By now, I have quite a lot of information. Sorry to say, but I found all of it by myself. I want to share one piece with you: I just read two articles by Marcia Angell published in The New York Review of Books, the first was in the June…"
I believe that meta-analysis is no longer seriously challenged, except perhaps in camps that doubt science as a means to the truth. Instead, the hallmarks of strong systematic reviews (including meta-analysis) are beginning to become…"
"Hi and thanks! I have the Rothstein et al. book on my shelf but I did not screen it. Thanks for the reminder. Would you think it worthwhile to try to review the discussion on metaanalysis validity so far? I guess one man can do the work…"
"Yes, John Ioannidis is a good place to start. I was particularly stunned by his group's demonstration of how dramatically different excluded literature results were from included literature. He compared gene-association results from the West…"
My aim is to review important discussion on meta-analysis. It includes discussions of missing article, missed sub-group analyses agreement/disagremment between meta-analyses, and between meta-analyses and big RCT:s. I know there is a literature, but need suggestions on where to start. Am I right when I suggestb that Ioannides is one of the analysts taht have added to this topic?Why? I teach MA and I have put togerther technical compendoum. One of my students suggested I add a number of good…See More
How is everything with you, I picked interest on you after going through your short profile and deemed it necessary to write you immediately. I have something very vital to disclose to you, but I found it difficult to express myself here, since it's a public site.Could you please get back to me on:(firstname.lastname@example.org ) for the full details. Have a nice day Thanks God bless.